Comments on: It’s a new year for Gift Aid! http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/ The Gift Aid Blog is powered by Blackbaud employees Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:53:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: Reza Islam http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-5 Reza Islam Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:17:57 +0000 http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-5 Although the 6th of April 2000 is not a valid date to claim from, I understood this date would infact be valid to remain on the declaration itself. It's the claim process that needs to be tweaked to only look at previous 6 years. The HMRC Declaration model suggests wording should be changed to reflect the 6 year rule. But by changing the wording could cause more confusion to donors thus reduce response rate, introduce re-print costs for the charity, as well as IT development/data-capturing costs! Although the 6th of April 2000 is not a valid date to claim from, I understood this date would infact be valid to remain on the declaration itself. It’s the claim process that needs to be tweaked to only look at previous 6 years.

The HMRC Declaration model suggests wording should be changed to reflect the 6 year rule. But by changing the wording could cause more confusion to donors thus reduce response rate, introduce re-print costs for the charity, as well as IT development/data-capturing costs!

]]> By: Gina Marwick http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-8 Gina Marwick Tue, 01 May 2007 10:21:36 +0000 http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-8 This date can indeed remain on the form, but where new forms are being created then it would be more prudent to put the updated date on it. The concern is that where this earlier date remains on the form, a charity may be more likely to accidentally claim from this date instead of the later date. This date can indeed remain on the form, but where new forms are being created then it would be more prudent to put the updated date on it. The concern is that where this earlier date remains on the form, a charity may be more likely to accidentally claim from this date instead of the later date.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-4012 Anonymous Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:35:41 +0000 http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-4012 <strong>First Time Lesbins...</strong> First Time Lesbins... First Time Lesbins…

First Time Lesbins…

]]> By: Dotty http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-4332 Dotty Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:39:03 +0000 http://www.giftaidblog.com/2007/04/03/its-a-new-year-for-gift-aid/#comment-4332 This is first time in my life when I don’t know what to say. After reading all comments I’m shocked. What has happened with our society, with our young generation? They are commenting terrible information, their lexis sounds terrible. Is that true, that only words they know is “cool”, “cute” and cussing words? What are they thinking of? It’s better not to think about it, it’s too sad This is first time in my life when I don’t know what to say. After reading all comments I’m shocked. What has happened with our society, with our young generation? They are commenting terrible information, their lexis sounds terrible. Is that true, that only words they know is “cool”, “cute” and cussing words? What are they thinking of? It’s better not to think about it, it’s too sad

]]>